Hannity and Tamara Holder

Sean Hannity, Tamara Holder

On Sean Hannity radio talk show, October 17, 2011, Hannity had two guests: an attorney of sorts; a well informed and logical person and Tamara Holder from Chicago. In a way it was an ambush because Tamara got caught lying.

Sometimes it is so difficult to understand the issues when people, such as Tamara, dodge the questions, and add foolish, disconnected, anecdotes. Issues are not impossible to understand when addressed. Problems lie with hidden gendas that require ignorance on the part of the exploited. We are a stifled and subdued society. This is for all to read and understand.

I am, by no means, supporting Hannity, the con/repubs, or the capitalists, but we need some honesty to establish truth's communicative foundations. Tamara had none. She has an agenda for her own gain. Her own gain is not necessarily the best for anyone else even though she might use "share the wealth" as an excuse to cover her lies. Hannity had the moral upper hand with about 10% more honest disclosure. He does what he is told. It is significant to note that neither con/repubs or dem/libs have a moral ground. So both sides are to blame for the poor exchange of ideas. If we have no truths upon which we can rely for logical discussion and deductive reasoning, we are no better than instinctive, cognitively dissociated animals that deserve to be ordered and exploited. Hannity, like the con/repub media, does reiterate the lies of the capitalists, especially the Washington District of Columbia Capitalists. This could be the goal of those in power, but for now the front-line men and women need to be seen for what they really are, liars and thieves. To be liars and thieves is no small crime. Small crime leads to, or is the cover for, other crimes. To lie is to steal. Welcome to politics.

The history of the world is a travesty of justice that always starts with small, seemingly favored and tolerable lies. A never ending litany of historical mis-facts and organized deception has changed history. Hitler, for example, freeing Germans in The Sudetenland was the beginning of an onslaught the world, as we know, had never experienced. One lie, favored, by a few politicos of those dark days, and the masses of the world suffered heavily. This was by design, as it is today.

Tamara Holder cherishes her favorite lies, as do all dem/libs, con/repubs, and every single politico and mandarin controlling the politicos.

Her words, "Google sends ALL their money overseas." The attorney asked her if Google had people working in the US? She dodged this question. It was a simple question. Her reply was to stammer and relate unrelated anecdotes; all tactics of lying.

Before I go further, I ask dem/lib people if you really want to follow a liar? What is in it for you if that liar lies to gain your support? Are you required to throw your soul and adoration at someone willing to cover other crimes, against YOU? People do not lie to YOU because they love you. People do not lie to YOU because they want what is best for YOU. People do not lie to YOU because they have a shred of respect for YOU.

This is no different than a con/repub politico or a con/repub person lying to you, I, or anyone. A liar lies to YOU for the sole purpose of USING YOU!

So when an idiot, with so little rationale, Tamara Holder, creates anecdotes or dodges questions, she is attempting to deceive the listeners, YOU, and I. She is looking for suckers that will rise up in anger without thinking, directed by her against others. This is so she can gain with no risk. YOU are taking the risk. Both sides play this game. Both sides have an un-believable mix of issues that leave many arguing out of both sides of their mouths.

What are WE, the People asking for? Do we want honest public servants or do we want something else? Holder’s accusations that she was being yelled at and that ALL money went overseas constitutes deception. She is a liar. Liars should be fired.

She argued that these corporations are avoiding their responsibilities by hiding money in other countries. The attorney asked her direct questions. He asked her for specifics. None were forthcoming. She could give no specifics nor direct answers because she was either trying to deceive listeners, to USE THEM, or she was just plain stupid and un-prepared. There is no way she was un-prepared. Even a bad liar will bring some un-truth, rhetoric, or horrible social event to a discussion. Holder did not. She generalized about ALL corporations as if they ALL avoided responsibilities. But her list does not include all corporations. She missed the ones Oafama and his political thugs support, and the US government, not to be confused with the government of the United States of America. These are two separate entities; as separate as Google and Yahoo. One is a corporation, the other is a subdued and useless government.

Exposing one corporation that was doing something illegal, and prosecuting that corporation, was not part of her deception. In fact her deception was so vile she should be prosecuted. She was lying for the sole purpose of including all companies in her fraudulent generalization. She included companies that may very well be completely above the law and above reproach. In fact it would be completely possible she has designs on very legitimate and morally outstanding companies. What the dem/libs don’t tell anyone is that the best companies to work for have higher profits, IN AMERICA. Is it possible some of these companies attract the rotten thieves in government and associated companies (yes, companies) because they appear to be plump and ripe for exploitation even though they have been completely legal and have no offshore accounts or money hidden? YES. Holder was lying about some companies. Which ones? Does it matter? She is a liar. This means she has other crimes she already committed or is about to commit, with government force of law. What kind of monsters are these communist liars?

All companies are politically identified to her, by other liars. To Holder these companies are evil because she sees them this way, being easily convinced because she wants to see them this way. She must demonize the victim so she can steal and destroy with impunity and without conscience.

It is not a misunderstanding or a failure to see rationale, as Hannity is commanded to propagate. It is an organized deception to gain control of others’ labor. It is slavery. Hannity and all the talk show hosts continually pine and whine that these dem/lib people, ‘just don’t get it.’

But they do.

What they don’t want is for the people to get it. Con/repubs do the same, using different tactics, killing different people in different ways. Make no mistakes; corporate government is no friend to the people.

Dem/lib people need to face the facts, as do con/repub people, that their party leaders are party people, and they want the people to believe their fraud is a mistake. They do not, in any way, shape, or fashion represent We, the People.

Holder continued with more deception, by various tactics (if her absolute stupidity can be called tactical), "You are going to call ALL the protestors anti-Semites?", she asked regarding Hannity’s comment, "There’s a lot of anti-Semites....". But stop right here. Did Holder think she caught Hannity lying? She twisted his words to entrap him in a non-existent lie she was trying to create to deceive listeners. It was only one sentence after his. Did she think the listeners would not notice? What an idiot, or an absolute manipulator with impunity. She was trying, again, to deceive listeners. WHY? To use them. Hannity said there’s a lot..... This could mean 10% is a lot. It could mean 50% is a lot. It definitely implies it is more than zero, but it is a comparative and subjective statement that NOT ALL, are anti-Semites. Again, "ALL were Holder’s words she used to villainize Hannity. Who is the villain when one lies to YOU, to USE YOU? The liar! Holder’s lie, as it is, again, when someone uses emotion to victimize a group that stands aloof, could be a well rehearsed tactic she purposely uses. Quo bono, the people being deceived or her? It could not be otherwise, unless she is so stupid she has no control over her own emotions and thoughts. In other words, is she capable of thinking before opening her yap?

This is another significant accusation I make against her and her pseudo, tactical manipulations. Either she is not capable of thinking rationally and controlling her true agendas and thoughts, or she is purposely trying to manipulate the truth; people. She is hopeful that WE, the People, will accept her braintard truths, in ignorance. She hopes We, the People, dem/libs and con/repubs, will not investigate, read, research, and learn. Only ignorant fearful people can be deceived all the time, and this leads to their enslavement. Holder works for tyrants, and she knows it, otherwise she would not lie so boldly.

Hannity works for tyrants, and he knows it, otherwise he would not lie. My favorite Hannitism is, "They all hate us." No the muslims don’t all hate us. Does Ahmed Bartani hate me? He doesn’t know me. Would he hate me if he knew I was a voice aginst the corruption of the establishment media, that threatens him every day in Iraq? NO! NO, Hannity, is lying to cover something else.

Consider Hannity’s various theme songs. I do not know the name of the song nor the "artist", if country bumkin’ sub intellect, pretentious life-style, down-beat, self-defeatist, sub-musical auditory derisions can be called artistic, but the line he uses is, "We’ll put a boot in your a__, that’s the American way...."

What kind of sub-cultural beat does country music carry? What is the message of the near retarded lyrics of country music, fraudulently representing a culture no-one lives, yet all adherents fake? How on earth could Hannity claim a cognizance of voluntary stupidity amongst a delusional sub-culture? To associate his show and his intelligence levels with regressive imbeciles faking, in a nationwide fantasy, is to use emotion of stupidity, himself. It is a fraud he commits not unlike his "opponents".

Furthermore, consider the message of just this one line. We’ll put a boot in your a__, that’s the American way."

To whom does this song refer? Is the "artist" referring to dem/lib people? Hmmmm. Aren’t dem/lib people also Americans that deserve presumption of innocence and a trial? Isn’t it ironic that the ignorant, purposely regressive fools have the audacity to suggest the higher educated dem/libs are guilty? Maybe this is what irritates dem/lib sophists, the fact that con/repubs have guns (not true- dem/libs have guns too), and the dem/libs know con/repubs will use the guns, coded by "...boot in the a__...", to get their way. But, the dem/libs aren’t smarter, nor sophisticated, they have their equally ignorant sub-clutures supporting their sophist, spurious communist lies.

The irony is further complicated when con/repubs refuse to acknowledge that "...boot in the a__..." is for anyone that refuses to dumb themselves down to a base level barely above a monkey-see monkey-do level (George W. Bush monkey), or a dog that barks in incomplete sentences (Barky Oafama). Dem/lib sophists; that is politicos and their entourage of controlled intelligentsia, are right to some degree. They are right in that they think they have a superior intelligence to bumkin’ country cliche artists, which is really what country music is. The con/repubs, led by Hannity, prove it daily.

And con/repubs are also right about the fake intelligence by communal fraud and deception of the dumbed-down dem/libs. We could probably add to this list, as a nail in the coffin of the communist dem/lib fantasies, the excessively ignorant sub-cultures and cultures, ie Mexican supporters that can speak no English and are very susceptible to politico lies of something for nothing. It would be interesting to collect and compile all the IQs of con/repub people in the country, and all the dem/lib people in the country. My bet is that the con/repubs are about a monkey’s level, and the dem/libs are about a gorilla’s level with government arms and hands to mangle opponents. We are witnessing it before our eyes.

Neither side in the people’s domain has reason or justification to lie. Dem/libs have no justification to enslave dumber con/repubs, and con/repubs make the same claim. Neither have reason to lie because neither gain from politico fraud and outright deception.

Another irony presents itself in this. Who is smarter, con/repubs that recognize the lies, fraud, and tyranny of their would-be oppressors, or the dem/libs that believe their oppressors, that lie to them, are not their would-be oppressors?

Let us look at the "American way...", as the "artist" has scribed, scribbled, whatever.

What is the American way? In Iraq, it is shock and awe; awe mostly apparent in military narcissism. In Iraq it is occupation, seizure, and murder. In Afghanistan it is the same, but it is also operations to instigate war with Pakistan, intimidate Pakistan to be "our" friend. In Afghanistan and Iraq, it is to be the world’s biggest losers and laughing stock.

There is nothing moral, just, ethical, honest, or kind about a country of 300 million pounding the spirit out of a country of less than 30 million. But the politicos say it is, and they never lie (choke), and the dem/lib politicos stood shoulder to shoulder in their fight, WITH con/repub politicos, to attack, invade, rob at gun-point, and murder un-armed men, women, and children.

Welcome to 'the American way" of dem/libs and con/repubs, promoted by Hannity and some country "music" cliche artist. Hmmmm. Who really voted for Oafama in first place? And what is Tamara Holder’s hidden agenda? Not so hidden, really, she just wants what all thieves, tyrants, and politicos, and their entourage want: wealth and life at others’ expense.